Randomized Controlled Trials 6: Determining the Sample Size and Power for Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies

Performing well-powered, randomized, controlled trials is of fundamental importance in clinical research. The goal of sample size calculations is to assure that statistical power is sufficiently high when the probability of falsely rejecting a true null hypothesis (type I error) is kept acceptably small. This chapter overviews the fundamental of sample size calculation for standard types of outcomes for 2-group studies. It also considers (1) the problem of determining the size of the treatment effect that a study should be designed to detect, (2) modifications to sample size calculations to account for loss to follow-up and nonadherence, (3) options that can be used when initial calculations indicate that the feasible sample size is insufficient to provide adequate power, (4) implications of using multiple primary end points. In addition, a discussion of cluster randomized trials is provided. Sample size estimates for longitudinal cohort studies must take account of confounding by baseline factors.

Keywords: Cluster randomized trials; Cohort studies; Power; Randomized clinical trials; Sample size estimation; Type I error; Type II error.

Similar articles

Greene T. Greene T. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1281:225-47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_13. Methods Mol Biol. 2015. PMID: 25694313

Moerbeek M. Moerbeek M. Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):420-429. doi: 10.1177/1740774520913042. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Clin Trials. 2020. PMID: 32191129 Free PMC article.

Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G. Brookes ST, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. doi: 10.3310/hta5330. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701102 Review.

Lochner HV, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd. Lochner HV, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Nov;83(11):1650-5. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200111000-00005. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001. PMID: 11701786

Case LD, Ambrosius WT. Case LD, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;404:377-408. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_19. Methods Mol Biol. 2007. PMID: 18450060 Review.

References

    1. Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2002) Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet 359(9302):248–252 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Friedman LM, Furberg C, DeMets DL (1998) Fundamentals of clinical trials, vol 3. Springer, New York, pp 133–168 - DOI
    1. Birkett MA, Day SJ (1994) Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size. Stat Med 13(23–24):2455–2463 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Ellis PD (2010) The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge - DOI
    1. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82(4):591–605 - PubMed - DOI